Kekhawatiran dunia,..ancaman nyata bagi dakwah rahmatan lil alamin sebagaimana diserukan rasulullah SAW
Don’t Fear All Islamists, Fear Salafis
By ROBIN WRIGHT
Published: August 19, 2012
-
As Syrian War Drags On, Jihadists Take Bigger Role (July 30, 2012)
Related in Opinion
Times Topic: Middle East
Connect With Us on Twitter
For Op-Ed, follow @nytopinion and to hear from the editorial page
editor, Andrew Rosenthal, follow @andyrNYT.
THIS spring, I traveled to the cradle of the Arab uprisings — a forlorn street corner in Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia,
where a street vendor, drenched in paint thinner, struck a match in
December 2010 that ignited the entire Middle East. “We have far more
freedoms,” one peddler hawking fruit in the same square lamented, “but
far fewer jobs.” Another noted that Mohamed Bouazizi,
the vendor who set himself on fire, did so not to vote in a democratic
election but because harassment by local officials had cost him his
livelihood.
As the peddlers vented, prayers ended at the whitewashed mosque across
the street. Among the faithful were Salafis, ultraconservative Sunni
Muslims vying to define the new order according to seventh-century
religious traditions rather than earthly realities. For years, many
Salafis — “salaf” means predecessors — had avoided politics and embraced
autocrats as long as they were Muslims. But over the past eight months,
clusters of worshipers across the Middle East have morphed into
powerful Salafi movements that are tapping into the disillusionment and
disorder of transitions.
A new Salafi Crescent, radiating from the Persian Gulf sheikdoms into
the Levant and North Africa, is one of the most underappreciated and
disturbing byproducts of the Arab revolts. In varying degrees, these
populist puritans are moving into the political space once occupied by
jihadi militants, who are now less in vogue. Both are fundamentalists
who favor a new order modeled on early Islam. Salafis are not
necessarily fighters, however. Many disavow violence.
In Tunisia, Salafis started the Reform Front party in May and led
protests, including in Sidi Bouzid. This summer, they’ve repeatedly
attacked symbols of the new freedom of speech, ransacking an art gallery
and blocking Sufi musicians and political comedians from performing. In
Egypt,
Salafis emerged last year from obscurity, hastily formed parties, and
in January won 25 percent of the seats in parliament — second only to
the 84-year-old Muslim Brotherhood. Salafis are a growing influence in Syria’s rebellion. And they have parties or factions in Algeria, Bahrain, Kuwait, Libya, Yemen and among Palestinians.
Salafis are only one slice of a rapidly evolving Islamist spectrum. The
variety of Islamists in the early 21st century recalls socialism’s many
shades in the 20th. Now, as then, some Islamists are more hazardous to
Western interests and values than others. The Salafis are most averse to
minority and women’s rights.
A common denominator among disparate Salafi groups is inspiration and support from Wahhabis, a puritanical strain of Sunni Islam from Saudi Arabia. Not all Saudis are Wahhabis. Not all Salafis are Wahhabis, either. But Wahhabis are basically all Salafis. And many Arabs, particularly outside the sparsely populated Gulf, suspect that Wahhabis are trying to seize the future by aiding and abetting the region’s newly politicized Salafis — as they did 30 years ago by funding the South Asian madrassas that produced Afghanistan’s Taliban.
Salafis go much further in restricting political and personal life than
the larger and more modern Islamist parties that have won electoral
pluralities in Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco since October. For most Arabs,
the rallying cry is justice, both economic and political. For Salafis,
it is also about a virtue that is inflexible and enforceable.
“You have two choices: heaven or hellfire,” Sheikh Muhammad el-Kurdi
instructed me after his election to Egypt’s parliament as a member of Al
Nour, a Salafi party. It favors gender segregation in schools and
offices, he told me, so that men can concentrate. “It’s O.K. for you to
be in the room,” he explained. “You are our guest, and we know why
you’re here. But you are one woman and we are three men — and we all
want to marry you.” Marriage may have been a euphemism.
Other more modern Islamists fear the Salafi factor. “The Salafis try to
push us,” said Rachid al-Ghannouchi, founder of Ennahda, the ruling
Islamist party in Tunisia. The two Islamist groups there are now rivals.
“Salafis are against drafting a constitution. They think it is the
Koran,” grumbled Merhézia Labidi, the vice chairwoman of Tunisia’s
Constituent Assembly and a member of Ennahda.
Salafis are deepening the divide between Sunni and Shiite Muslims and challenging the “Shiite Crescent,” a term coined by Jordan’s
King Abdullah in 2004, during the Iraq war, to describe an arc of
influence from Shiite-dominated Iran to its allies in Iraq, Syria and
Lebanon. Today, these rival crescents risk turning countries in
transition into battlefields over the region’s future.
The Salafis represent a painful long-term conundrum for the West. Their
goals are the most anti-Western of any Islamist parties. They are trying
to push both secularists and other Islamists into the
not-always-virtuous past.
American policy recently had its own awakening after 60 years of support
for autocratic rulers. The United States opted to embrace people power
and electoral change in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Yemen. Yet
Washington still embraces authoritarian Gulf monarchies like Saudi
Arabia, tolerating their vague promises of reform and even pledging the
United States’ might to protect them.
Foreign policy should be nuanced, whether because of oil needs or to
counter threats from Iran. But there is something dreadfully wrong with
tying America’s future position in the region to the birthplace and
bastion of Salafism and its warped vision of a new order.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar